Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ollie Parks's avatar

What’s striking about this account is how thoroughly it confirms that Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t merely a deviant aberration operating on the margins, but a grotesquely successful embodiment of a certain American male ideal. If we want to understand his power, we have to stop treating him solely as a monster and start seeing him as what many men quietly admire: hyper-confident, transgressive, socially omnivorous, plugged into money, intelligence, geopolitics, and sex with apparent impunity.

Epstein’s appeal to rich and powerful men was not mysterious. He projected mastery—over networks, secrets, women, and states. He moved easily among arms dealers, intelligence cut-outs, Gulf royalty, financiers, and political operatives, always implying that he knew more than he said and that rules were for other people. That posture maps closely onto a widely admired heterosexual alpha-male fantasy: effectiveness without accountability, appetite without restraint, and access without consequence.

Seen this way, the sexual crimes are not an accidental add-on to his power but part of the same ethos. Many men would recoil from Epstein’s scale of abuse, but far fewer object in principle to “a little” transgression, especially when it appears to be rewarded with status and protection. The admiration isn’t for the rapes themselves; it’s for the aura of untouchability that seemed to license everything else.

Burleigh’s reporting underscores this point by showing that Epstein’s real currency was usefulness. He wasn’t welcomed into elite circles because people were fooled about who he was; he was welcomed because who he was fit comfortably within existing norms of male power—norms that prize boldness, secrecy, leverage, and a willingness to operate in moral gray zones. If Epstein shocks us, it’s less because he was alien than because he reveals, in exaggerated form, what is already tolerated, envied, and sometimes aspired to.

Until that ideal is confronted, Epstein will keep being misread as a singular pathology rather than as a cautionary exemplar of where a certain model of masculinity, when fully indulged, actually leads.

Lucian K. Truscott IV's avatar

Indespensable. Thank you.

12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?