6 Comments
Feb 27Liked by Nina Burleigh

You outdid yourself with this critique of CPAC and it’s denizens! Louboutin 👠!

Expand full comment
Feb 29Liked by Nina Burleigh

Thank you for a new word: ‘batshittery.” I think that clears the way for “crackpottery,” which I’ve been reluctant to use.

As for all the sexual kinks and hijinks, for some reason they most often seem to lodge in Republicans or Catholics -- or, if you prefer, Catholic Republicans.

Which brings us to today, though not in the literal sense. It is beyond me why a bunch of (mostly) Catholic men want to stick it to women (no, not in that sense)

about sex and reproduction. They’ve miscalculated greatly, which one hopes will be proven on Election Day when all, or most of these freaks are not reelected. I leave it to future historians and shrinks to determine why all these Catholic men want to get into women’s bedrooms and regulate what goes on with their cooches.

Expand full comment
Feb 28Liked by Nina Burleigh

Excellent and necessary piece!

Thank you for it!

Expand full comment
Feb 28Liked by Nina Burleigh

Wow! I think I might need to get my haldol scrip refilled now!

Expand full comment

Let me give you a picture of the one who leads these mother-fuckers, claiming to be Christians:

It’s from the actual legal complaint.

Case 1:16-cv-04642 Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, )

DONALD J. TRUMP and ) JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, ) ) Defendants. )

---------------------------------------------------------------

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS, SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION ______________________________________________________________________________

Plaintiff Jane Doe, proceeding under a pseudonym, brings this action against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein,

*****

“Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties. On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B”

********

….Plaintiff was unrelentingly threatened by each Defendant that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse caused to her by Defendants, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. The duress has not terminated and the fear has not subsided. The duress is an element of or inherent in the underlying causes of action complained of herein. The duress and coercion exerted by Defendants has been such as to have actually deprived Plaintiff of her freedom of will to institute suit earlier in time, and it rose to such a level that a person of reasonable firmness in Plaintiff's situation would have been unable to resist. Exhs. A and B.

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and …..

22. Any statute of limitations applicable to rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts, sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment of a minor, if any, is tolled owing to the continuous and active duress imposed upon Plaintiff by Defendants that effectively robbed Plaintiff of her free will to commence legal action until the present time. Cullen v. Margiotta, 811 F.2d 698, 722 (2nd Cir.1987); Ross v. United States, 574 F. Supp. 536, 542 (S.D.N.Y. 1983). More particularly, Plaintiff was unrelentingly threatened by each Defendant that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse caused to her by Defendants, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. The duress has not terminated and the fear has not subsided. The duress is an element of or inherent in the underlying causes of action complained of herein. The duress and coercion exerted by Defendants has been such as to have actually deprived Plaintiff of her freedom of will to institute suit earlier in time, and it rose to such a level that a person of reasonable firmness in Plaintiff's situation would have been unable to resist. Exhs. A and B.

23. Both Defendants let Plaintiff know that each was a very wealthy, powerful man and indicated that they had the power, ability and means to carry out their threats. Indeed, Defendant Trump stated that Plaintiff shouldn’t ever say anything if she didn’t want to disappear like Maria, a 12-year-old female that was forced to be involved in the third incident……

THAT’S what MAGAts stand for: The worst humanity has to offer; a Rapist and a Fraud. Trump might as well say, “FUCK ALL CHRISTENDOM” to his IDIOT followers.

Expand full comment